The other day, I stumbled upon a
provocative piece in the New York Times titled "Art Museums are Looking
for that Next Big Gift." Its thesis won't surprise IP readers. Public
museums, lacking the cash to purchase major artwork in the marketplace, pine
for that special collector's gift to broaden their offerings and attract new
audiences.
The piece came, ironically
enough, a couple of weeks after Patricia Phelps de Cisneros and her husband,
Gustavo A. Cisneros, announced they would give 102 pieces of Latin American Art
and establish a research institute for the study of said art at the Museum of
Modern Art (MoMA).
Beyond the serendipitous timing,
the development also underscores the unique dynamics that lead to such gifts
and highlights the emerging popularity of Latin American art across a
curatorial space starving for contemporary work.
As we've repeatedly noted on IP,
contemporary art gifts usually have a rich and textured backstory. Back in
September, Perez Art Museum Miami received over 400 language-based artworks
from the collection of Ruth and Marvin Sackner. The gift was brokered by the
Knight Foundation, whose CEO had a close personal relationship with the
now-deceased Ruth.
And in August, collectors Francie
Bishop Good and David Horvitz promised 100 of their 800 contemporary works to
the NSU Art Museum in Fort Lauderdale. Good is an NSU Art Museum board member.
Horvitz is the chairman of the board.
Needless to say, the Cisneros'
relationship with the MoMA is equally deep. Over the last 16 years, the couple
has donated 40 pieces — we're talking Modernist abstraction and contemporary
works by artists from Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina and Uruguay — to the MoMA,
where Patricia has served on the board since 1992.
Which brings us to this gift's
second key takeaway.
As museums scramble to beef up
their contemporary art holdings, Cisneros' gift shines a light on the
traditionally ignored world of contemporary Latin American art. This lack of
awareness clearly factored into Cisneros' decision making. "My big
frustration in Latin America is, we've always been on the back burner in many
areas, certainly in art," she said. "It was one of the great centers
of Modernism in the '50s, yet hasn't been taken into account."
The proposed Patricia Phelps de
Cisneros Research Institute for the Study of Art from Latin America will play a
critical role in boosting exposure by offering colloquia, fellowships,
publications and scholarly conferences.
What's more, Ms. Cisneros's gift
came with an important caveat. She allowed the MoMA to pick from her home
collection as long as the museum, in addition to displaying the pieces, would
regularly loan the works to other institutions.
This is important, as collectors
want assurance that their work won't end up in a dusty basement. In fact, this
issue of accessibility is a main reason why some collectors start their own
galleries from scratch. For example, one of the motivations behind billionaire
J. Tomilson Hill's new gallery is the fact that, according to Hill, "we've
got so much art in storage."
(Another detriment to public
museums is that private galleries like Hill's effectively take work off the
market, thereby exacerbating scarcity and further driving up prices.)
I'm going out on a limb, here, to
theorize that for the MoMA, the benefit of acquiring Cisneros' work certainly
outweighed the drawback of having to occasionally loan it out. I'm also sure
that most museums, impatiently waiting for that next big contemporary art gift,
would agree to such a deal in a heartbeat.